@unpublished {466, title = {Longitudinal multi-omics study reveals common etiology underlying association between plasma proteome and BMI trajectories in adolescent and young adult twins}, journal = {medRxiv}, year = {2023}, abstract = {

Background: The influence of genetics and environment on the association of the plasma proteome with body mass index (BMI) and changes in BMI remain underexplored, and the links to other omics in these associations remain to be investigated. We characterized protein-BMI trajectory associations in adolescents and adults and how these connect to other omics layers.

Methods: Our study included two cohorts of longitudinally followed twins: FinnTwin12 (N=651) and the Netherlands Twin Register (NTR) (N=665). Follow-up comprised four BMI measurements over approximately 6 (NTR: 23-27 years old) to 10 years (FinnTwin12: 12-22 years old), with omics data collected at the last BMI measurement. BMI changes were calculated using latent growth curve models. Mixed-effects models were used to quantify the associations between the abundance of 439 plasma proteins with BMI at blood sampling and changes in BMI. The sources of genetic and environmental variation underlying the protein abundances were quantified using twin models, as were the associations of proteins with BMI and BMI changes. In NTR, we investigated the association of gene expression of genes encoding proteins identified in FinnTwin12 with BMI and changes in BMI. We linked identified proteins and their coding genes to plasma metabolites and polygenic risk scores (PRS) using mixed-effect models and correlation networks.

Results: We identified 66 and 14 proteins associated with BMI at blood sampling and changes in BMI, respectively. The average heritability of these proteins was 35\%. Of the 66 BMI-protein associations, 43 and 12 showed genetic and environmental correlations, respectively, including 8 proteins showing both. Similarly, we observed 6 and 4 genetic and environmental correlations between changes in BMI and protein abundance, respectively. S100A8 gene expression was associated with BMI at blood sampling, and the PRG4 and CFI genes were associated with BMI changes. Proteins showed strong connections with many metabolites and PRSs, but we observed no multi-omics connections among gene expression and other omics layers.

Conclusions: Associations between the proteome and BMI trajectories are characterized by shared genetic, environmental, and metabolic etiologies. We observed few gene-protein pairs associated with BMI or changes in BMI at the proteome and transcriptome levels.

}, doi = {10.1101/2023.06.28.23291995}, author = {Drouard, Gabin and Hagenbeek, Fiona A and Whipp, Alyce and Pool, Ren{\'e} and Hottenga, Jouke-Jan and Jansen, Rick and Hubers, Nikki and Afonin, Aleksei and Willemsen, Gonneke and de Geus, Eco J C and Ripatti, Samuli and Pirinen, Matti and Kanninen, Katja M and Boomsma, Dorret I and van Dongen, Jenny and Kaprio, Jaakko and BIOS Consortium and BBMRI-NL Metabolomics Consortium} } @article {455, title = {Genome-wide association meta-analysis of childhood and adolescent internalizing symptoms}, journal = {Journal of the American Academy of Child \& Adolescent Psychiatry}, volume = {61}, year = {2022}, pages = {934{\textendash}945}, abstract = {

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the genetic architecture of internalizing symptoms in childhood and adolescence.

METHOD: In 22 cohorts, multiple univariate genome-wide association studies (GWASs) were performed using repeated assessments of internalizing symptoms, in a total of 64,561 children and adolescents between 3 and 18 years of age. Results were aggregated in meta-analyses that accounted for sample overlap, first using all available data, and then using subsets of measurements grouped by rater, age, and instrument.

RESULTS: The meta-analysis of overall internalizing symptoms (INToverall) detected no genome-wide significant hits and showed low single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) heritability (1.66\%, 95\% CI = 0.84-2.48

}, keywords = {anxiety, Depression, genetic epidemiology, molecular genetics, repeated measures}, doi = {10.1016/j.jaac.2021.11.035}, author = {Jami, Eshim S and Hammerschlag, Anke R and Ip, Hill F and Allegrini, Andrea G and Benyamin, Beben and Border, Richard and Diemer, Elizabeth W and Jiang, Chang and Karhunen, Ville and Lu, Yi and Lu, Qing and Mallard, Travis T and Mishra, Pashupati P and Nolte, Ilja M and Palviainen, Teemu and Peterson, Roseann E and Sallis, Hannah M and Shabalin, Andrey A and Tate, Ashley E and Thiering, Elisabeth and Vilor-Tejedor, Nat{\`a}lia and Wang, Carol and Zhou, Ang and Adkins, Daniel E and Alemany, Silvia and Ask, Helga and Chen, Qi and Corley, Robin P and Ehli, Erik A and Evans, Luke M and Havdahl, Alexandra and Hagenbeek, Fiona A and Hakulinen, Christian and Henders, Anjali K and Hottenga, Jouke Jan and Korhonen, Tellervo and Mamun, Abdullah and Marrington, Shelby and Neumann, Alexander and Rimfeld, Kaili and Rivadeneira, Fernando and Silberg, Judy L and van Beijsterveldt, Catharina E and Vuoksimaa, Eero and Whipp, Alyce M and Tong, Xiaoran and Andreassen, Ole A and Boomsma, Dorret I and Brown, Sandra A and Burt, S Alexandra and Copeland, William and Dick, Danielle M and Harden, K Paige and Harris, Kathleen Mullan and Hartman, Catharina A and Heinrich, Joachim and Hewitt, John K and Hopfer, Christian and Hypponen, Elina and Jarvelin, Marjo-Riitta and Kaprio, Jaakko and Keltikangas-J{\"a}rvinen, Liisa and Klump, Kelly L and Krauter, Kenneth and Kuja-Halkola, Ralf and Larsson, Henrik and Lehtim{\"a}ki, Terho and Lichtenstein, Paul and Lundstr{\"o}m, Sebastian and Maes, Hermine H and Magnus, Per and Munaf{\`o}, Marcus R and Najman, Jake M and Nj{\o}lstad, P\aal R and Oldehinkel, Albertine J and Pennell, Craig E and Plomin, Robert and Reichborn-Kjennerud, Ted and Reynolds, Chandra and Rose, Richard J and Smolen, Andrew and Snieder, Harold and Stallings, Michael and Standl, Marie and Sunyer, Jordi and Tiemeier, Henning and Wadsworth, Sally J and Wall, Tamara L and Whitehouse, Andrew J O and Williams, Gail M and Ystr{\o}m, Eivind and Nivard, Michel G and Bartels, Meike and Middeldorp, Christel M} } @article {439, title = {DNA methylation signatures of aggression and closely related constructs: A meta-analysis of epigenome-wide studies across the lifespan}, journal = {Molecular Psychiatry}, volume = {26}, year = {2021}, pages = {2148{\textendash}2162}, abstract = {

DNA methylation profiles of aggressive behavior may capture lifetime cumulative effects of genetic, stochastic, and environmental influences associated with aggression. Here, we report the first large meta-analysis of epigenome-wide association studies (EWAS) of aggressive behavior (N = 15,324 participants). In peripheral blood samples of 14,434 participants from 18 cohorts with mean ages ranging from 7 to 68 years, 13 methylation sites were significantly associated with aggression (alpha = 1.2 $\times$ 10-7; Bonferroni correction). In cord blood samples of 2425 children from five cohorts with aggression assessed at mean ages ranging from 4 to 7 years, 83\% of these sites showed the same direction of association with childhood aggression (r = 0.7

}, doi = {10.1038/s41380-020-00987-x}, author = {van Dongen, Jenny and Hagenbeek, Fiona A and Suderman, Matthew and Roetman, Peter J and Sugden, Karen and Chiocchetti, Andreas G and Ismail, Khadeeja and Mulder, Rosa H and Hafferty, Jonathan D and Adams, Mark J and Walker, Rosie M and Morris, Stewart W and Lahti, Jari and K{\"u}pers, Leanne K and Escaramis, Georgia and Alemany, Silvia and Jan Bonder, Marc and Meijer, Mandy and Ip, Hill F and Jansen, Rick and Baselmans, Bart M L and Parmar, Priyanka and Lowry, Estelle and Streit, Fabian and Sirignano, Lea and Send, Tabea S and Frank, Josef and Jylh{\"a}v{\"a}, Juulia and Wang, Yunzhang and Mishra, Pashupati Prasad and Colins, Olivier F and Corcoran, David L and Poulton, Richie and Mill, Jonathan and Hannon, Eilis and Arseneault, Louise and Korhonen, Tellervo and Vuoksimaa, Eero and Felix, Janine F and Bakermans-Kranenburg, Marian J and Campbell, Archie and Czamara, Darina and Binder, Elisabeth and Corpeleijn, Eva and Gonzalez, Juan R and Grazuleviciene, Regina and Gutzkow, Kristine B and Evandt, Jorunn and Vafeiadi, Marina and Klein, Marieke and van der Meer, Dennis and Ligthart, Lannie and BIOS Consortium and Kluft, Cornelis and Davies, Gareth E and Hakulinen, Christian and Keltikangas-J{\"a}rvinen, Liisa and Franke, Barbara and Freitag, Christine M and Konrad, Kerstin and Hervas, Amaia and Fern{\'a}ndez-Rivas, Aranzazu and Vetro, Agnes and Raitakari, Olli and Lehtim{\"a}ki, Terho and Vermeiren, Robert and Strandberg, Timo and R{\"a}ikk{\"o}nen, Katri and Snieder, Harold and Witt, Stephanie H and Deuschle, Michael and Pedersen, Nancy L and H{\"a}gg, Sara and Sunyer, Jordi and Franke, Lude and Kaprio, Jaakko and Ollikainen, Miina and Moffitt, Terrie E and Tiemeier, Henning and van IJzendoorn, Marinus H and Relton, Caroline and Vrijheid, Martine and Sebert, Sylvain and Jarvelin, Marjo-Riitta and Caspi, Avshalom and Evans, Kathryn L and McIntosh, Andrew M and Bartels, Meike and Boomsma, Dorret I} } @article {437, title = {Genetic association study of childhood aggression across raters, instruments, and age}, journal = {Translational Psychiatry}, volume = {11}, year = {2021}, pages = {413}, abstract = {

Childhood aggressive behavior (AGG) has a substantial heritability of around 50\%. Here we present a genome-wide association meta-analysis (GWAMA) of childhood AGG, in which all phenotype measures across childhood ages from multiple assessors were included. We analyzed phenotype assessments for a total of 328 935 observations from 87 485 children aged between 1.5 and 18 years, while accounting for sample overlap. We also meta-analyzed within subsets of the data, i.e., within rater, instrument and age. SNP-heritability for the overall meta-analysis (AGGoverall) was 3.31\% (SE = 0.0038). We found no genome-wide significant SNPs for AGGoverall. The gene-based analysis returned three significant genes: ST3GAL3 (P = 1.6E-06), PCDH7 (P = 2.0E-06), and IPO13 (P = 2.5E-06). All three genes have previously been associated with educational traits. Polygenic scores based on our GWAMA significantly predicted aggression in a holdout sample of children (variance explained = 0.44\%) and in retrospectively assessed childhood aggression (variance explained = 0.20\%). Genetic correlations (rg) among rater-specific assessment of AGG ranged from rg = 0.46 between self- and teacher-assessment to rg = 0.81 between mother- and teacher-assessment. We obtained moderate-to-strong rgs with selected phenotypes from multiple domains, but hardly with any of the classical biomarkers thought to be associated with AGG. Significant genetic correlations were observed with most psychiatric and psychological traits (range [Formula: see text]: 0.19-1.00), except for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Aggression had a negative genetic correlation (rg = \ -0.5) with cognitive traits and age at first birth. Aggression was strongly genetically correlated with smoking phenotypes (range [Formula: see text]: 0.46-0.60). The genetic correlations between aggression and psychiatric disorders were weaker for teacher-reported AGG than for mother- and self-reported AGG. The current GWAMA of childhood aggression provides a powerful tool to interrogate the rater-specific genetic etiology of AGG.

}, doi = {10.1038/s41398-021-01480-x}, author = {Ip, Hill F and Van der Laan, Camiel M and Krapohl, Eva M L and Brikell, Isabell and S{\'a}nchez-Mora, Cristina and Nolte, Ilja M and St Pourcain, Beate and Bolhuis, Koen and Palviainen, Teemu and Zafarmand, Hadi and Colodro-Conde, Luc{\'\i}a and Gordon, Scott and Zayats, Tetyana and Aliev, Fazil and Jiang, Chang and Wang, Carol A and Saunders, Gretchen and Karhunen, Ville and Hammerschlag, Anke R and Adkins, Daniel E and Border, Richard and Peterson, Roseann E and Prinz, Joseph A and Thiering, Elisabeth and Sepp{\"a}l{\"a}, Ilkka and Vilor-Tejedor, Nat{\`a}lia and Ahluwalia, Tarunveer S and Day, Felix R and Hottenga, Jouke-Jan and Allegrini, Andrea G and Rimfeld, Kaili and Chen, Qi and Lu, Yi and Martin, Joanna and Soler Artigas, Mar{\'\i}a and Rovira, Paula and Bosch, Rosa and Espa{\~n}ol, Gemma and Ramos Quiroga, Josep Antoni and Neumann, Alexander and Ensink, Judith and Grasby, Katrina and Morosoli, Jos{\'e} J and Tong, Xiaoran and Marrington, Shelby and Middeldorp, Christel and Scott, James G and Vinkhuyzen, Anna and Shabalin, Andrey A and Corley, Robin and Evans, Luke M and Sugden, Karen and Alemany, Silvia and Sass, L{\ae}rke and Vinding, Rebecca and Ruth, Kate and Tyrrell, Jess and Davies, Gareth E and Ehli, Erik A and Hagenbeek, Fiona A and de Zeeuw, Eveline and van Beijsterveldt, Toos C E M and Larsson, Henrik and Snieder, Harold and Verhulst, Frank C and Amin, Najaf and Whipp, Alyce M and Korhonen, Tellervo and Vuoksimaa, Eero and Rose, Richard J and Uitterlinden, Andre G and Heath, Andrew C and Madden, Pamela and Haavik, Jan and Harris, Jennifer R and Helgeland, {\O}yvind and Johansson, Stefan and Knudsen, Gun Peggy S and Njolstad, Pal Rasmus and Lu, Qing and Rodriguez, Alina and Henders, Anjali K and Mamun, Abdullah and Najman, Jackob M and Brown, Sandy and Hopfer, Christian and Krauter, Kenneth and Reynolds, Chandra and Smolen, Andrew and Stallings, Michael and Wadsworth, Sally and Wall, Tamara L and Silberg, Judy L and Miller, Allison and Keltikangas-J{\"a}rvinen, Liisa and Hakulinen, Christian and Pulkki-R\aaback, Laura and Havdahl, Alexandra and Magnus, Per and Raitakari, Olli T and Perry, John R B and Llop, Sabrina and Lopez-Espinosa, Maria-Jose and B{\o}nnelykke, Klaus and Bisgaard, Hans and Sunyer, Jordi and Lehtim{\"a}ki, Terho and Arseneault, Louise and Standl, Marie and Heinrich, Joachim and Boden, Joseph and Pearson, John and Horwood, L John and Kennedy, Martin and Poulton, Richie and Eaves, Lindon J and Maes, Hermine H and Hewitt, John and Copeland, William E and Costello, Elizabeth J and Williams, Gail M and Wray, Naomi and Jarvelin, Marjo-Riitta and McGue, Matt and Iacono, William and Caspi, Avshalom and Moffitt, Terrie E and Whitehouse, Andrew and Pennell, Craig E and Klump, Kelly L and Burt, S Alexandra and Dick, Danielle M and Reichborn-Kjennerud, Ted and Martin, Nicholas G and Medland, Sarah E and Vrijkotte, Tanja and Kaprio, Jaakko and Tiemeier, Henning and Davey Smith, George and Hartman, Catharina A and Oldehinkel, Albertine J and Casas, Miquel and Ribas{\'e}s, Marta and Lichtenstein, Paul and Lundstr{\"o}m, Sebastian and Plomin, Robert and Bartels, Meike and Nivard, Michel G and Boomsma, Dorret I} } @article {428, title = {Higher aggression is related to poorer academic performance in compulsory education}, journal = {Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry}, volume = {62}, year = {2021}, pages = {327{\textendash}338}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: To conduct a comprehensive assessment of the association between aggression and academic performance in compulsory education.

METHOD: We studied aggression and academic performance in over 27,000 individuals from four European twin cohorts participating in the ACTION consortium (Aggression in Children: Unraveling gene-environment interplay to inform Treatment and InterventiON strategies). Individual level data on aggression at ages 7-16 were assessed by three instruments (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment, Multidimensional Peer Nomination Inventory, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire) including parental, teacher and self-reports. Academic performance was measured with teacher-rated grade point averages (ages 12-14) or standardized test scores (ages 12-16). Random effect meta-analytical correlations with academic performance were estimated for parental ratings (in all four cohorts) and self-ratings (in three cohorts).

RESULTS: All between-family analyses indicated significant negative aggression-academic performance associations with correlations ranging from -.06 to -.33. Results were similar across different ages, instruments and raters and either with teacher-rated grade point averages or standardized test scores as measures of academic performance. Meta-analytical r\&$\#$39;s were -.20 and -.23 for parental and self-ratings, respectively. In within-family analyses of all twin pairs, the negative aggression-academic performance associations were statistically significant in 14 out of 17 analyses (r = -.17 for parental- and r = -.16 for self-ratings). Separate analyses in monozygotic (r = -.07 for parental and self-ratings), same-sex dizygotic (r\&$\#$39;s = -.16 and -.17 for parental and self-ratings) and opposite-sex dizygotic (r\&$\#$39;s = -.21 and -.19 for parental and self-ratings) twin pairs suggested partial confounding by genetic effects.

CONCLUSIONS: There is a robust negative association between aggression and academic performance in compulsory education. Part of these associations were explained by shared genetic effects, but some evidence of a negative association between aggression and academic performance remained even in within-family analyses of monozygotic twin pairs.

}, keywords = {Aggression, cognition, development, educational attainment, school performance}, doi = {10.1111/jcpp.13273}, author = {Vuoksimaa, Eero and Rose, Richard J and Pulkkinen, Lea and Palviainen, Teemu and Rimfeld, Kaili and Lundstr{\"o}m, Sebastian and Bartels, Meike and van Beijsterveldt, Catharina and Hendriks, Anne and de Zeeuw, Eveline L and Plomin, Robert and Lichtenstein, Paul and Boomsma, Dorret I and Kaprio, Jaakko} } @article {449, title = {Higher aggression is related to poorer academic performance in compulsory education}, journal = {Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry}, volume = {62}, year = {2021}, pages = {327{\textendash}338}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: To conduct a comprehensive assessment of the association between aggression and academic performance in compulsory education.

METHOD: We studied aggression and academic performance in over 27,000 individuals from four European twin cohorts participating in the ACTION consortium (Aggression in Children: Unraveling gene-environment interplay to inform Treatment and InterventiON strategies). Individual level data on aggression at ages 7-16 were assessed by three instruments (Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment, Multidimensional Peer Nomination Inventory, Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire) including parental, teacher and self-reports. Academic performance was measured with teacher-rated grade point averages (ages 12-14) or standardized test scores (ages 12-16). Random effect meta-analytical correlations with academic performance were estimated for parental ratings (in all four cohorts) and self-ratings (in three cohorts).

RESULTS: All between-family analyses indicated significant negative aggression-academic performance associations with correlations ranging from -.06 to -.33. Results were similar across different ages, instruments and raters and either with teacher-rated grade point averages or standardized test scores as measures of academic performance. Meta-analytical r\&$\#$39;s were -.20 and -.23 for parental and self-ratings, respectively. In within-family analyses of all twin pairs, the negative aggression-academic performance associations were statistically significant in 14 out of 17 analyses (r = -.17 for parental- and r = -.16 for self-ratings). Separate analyses in monozygotic (r = -.07 for parental and self-ratings), same-sex dizygotic (r\&$\#$39;s = -.16 and -.17 for parental and self-ratings) and opposite-sex dizygotic (r\&$\#$39;s = -.21 and -.19 for parental and self-ratings) twin pairs suggested partial confounding by genetic effects.

CONCLUSIONS: There is a robust negative association between aggression and academic performance in compulsory education. Part of these associations were explained by shared genetic effects, but some evidence of a negative association between aggression and academic performance remained even in within-family analyses of monozygotic twin pairs.

}, keywords = {Aggression, cognition, development, educational attainment, school performance}, doi = {10.1111/jcpp.13273}, author = {Vuoksimaa, Eero and Rose, Richard J and Pulkkinen, Lea and Palviainen, Teemu and Rimfeld, Kaili and Lundstr{\"o}m, Sebastian and Bartels, Meike and van Beijsterveldt, Catharina and Hendriks, Anne and de Zeeuw, Eveline L and Plomin, Robert and Lichtenstein, Paul and Boomsma, Dorret I and Kaprio, Jaakko} } @article {440, title = {Identical twins carry a persistent epigenetic signature of early genome programming}, journal = {Nature Communications}, volume = {12}, year = {2021}, pages = {5618}, abstract = {

Monozygotic (MZ) twins and higher-order multiples arise when a zygote splits during pre-implantation stages of development. The mechanisms underpinning this event have remained a mystery. Because MZ twinning rarely runs in families, the leading hypothesis is that it occurs at random. Here, we show that MZ twinning is strongly associated with a stable DNA methylation signature in adult somatic tissues. This signature spans regions near telomeres and centromeres, Polycomb-repressed regions and heterochromatin, genes involved in cell-adhesion, WNT signaling, cell fate, and putative human metastable epialleles. Our study also demonstrates a never-anticipated corollary: because identical twins keep a lifelong molecular signature, we can retrospectively diagnose if a person was conceived as monozygotic twin.

}, doi = {10.1038/s41467-021-25583-7}, author = {van Dongen, Jenny and Gordon, Scott D and McRae, Allan F and Odintsova, Veronika V and Mbarek, Hamdi and Breeze, Charles E and Sugden, Karen and Lundgren, Sara and Castillo-Fernandez, Juan E and Hannon, Eilis and Moffitt, Terrie E and Hagenbeek, Fiona A and van Beijsterveldt, Catharina E M and Jan Hottenga, Jouke and Tsai, Pei-Chien and BIOS Consortium and Genetics of DNA Methylation Consortium and Min, Josine L and Hemani, Gibran and Ehli, Erik A and Paul, Franziska and Stern, Claudio D and Heijmans, Bastiaan T and Slagboom, P Eline and Daxinger, Lucia and van der Maarel, Silv{\`e}re M and de Geus, Eco J C and Willemsen, Gonneke and Montgomery, Grant W and Reversade, Bruno and Ollikainen, Miina and Kaprio, Jaakko and Spector, Tim D and Bell, Jordana T and Mill, Jonathan and Caspi, Avshalom and Martin, Nicholas G and Boomsma, Dorret I} } @article {443, title = {Sex-dimorphic genetic effects and novel loci for fasting glucose and insulin variability}, journal = {Nature Communications}, volume = {12}, year = {2021}, pages = {24}, abstract = {

Differences between sexes contribute to variation in the levels of fasting glucose and insulin. Epidemiological studies established a higher prevalence of impaired fasting glucose in men and impaired glucose tolerance in women, however, the genetic component underlying this phenomenon is not established. We assess sex-dimorphic (73,089/50,404 women and 67,506/47,806 men) and sex-combined (151,188/105,056 individuals) fasting glucose/fasting insulin genetic effects via genome-wide association study meta-analyses in individuals of European descent without diabetes. Here we report sex dimorphism in allelic effects on fasting insulin at IRS1 and ZNF12 loci, the latter showing higher RNA expression in whole blood in women compared to men. We also observe sex-homogeneous effects on fasting glucose at seven novel loci. Fasting insulin in women shows stronger genetic correlations than in men with waist-to-hip ratio and anorexia nervosa. Furthermore, waist-to-hip ratio is causally related to insulin resistance in women, but not in men. These results position dissection of metabolic and glycemic health sex dimorphism as a steppingstone for understanding differences in genetic effects between women and men in related phenotypes.

}, doi = {10.1038/s41467-020-19366-9}, author = {Lagou, Vasiliki and M{\"a}gi, Reedik and Hottenga, Jouke- Jan and Grallert, Harald and Perry, John R B and Bouatia-Naji, Nabila and Marullo, Letizia and Rybin, Denis and Jansen, Rick and Min, Josine L and Dimas, Antigone S and Ulrich, Anna and Zudina, Liudmila and G\aadin, Jesper R and Jiang, Longda and Faggian, Alessia and Bonnefond, Am{\'e}lie and Fadista, Joao and Stathopoulou, Maria G and Isaacs, Aaron and Willems, Sara M and Navarro, Pau and Tanaka, Toshiko and Jackson, Anne U and Montasser, May E and O{\textquoteright}Connell, Jeff R and Bielak, Lawrence F and Webster, Rebecca J and Saxena, Richa and Stafford, Jeanette M and Pourcain, Beate St and Timpson, Nicholas J and Salo, Perttu and Shin, So-Youn and Amin, Najaf and Smith, Albert V and Li, Guo and Verweij, Niek and Goel, Anuj and Ford, Ian and Johnson, Paul C D and Johnson, Toby and Kapur, Karen and Thorleifsson, Gudmar and Strawbridge, Rona J and Rasmussen-Torvik, Laura J and Esko, T{\~o}nu and Mihailov, Evelin and Fall, Tove and Fraser, Ross M and Mahajan, Anubha and Kanoni, Stavroula and Giedraitis, Vilmantas and Kleber, Marcus E and Silbernagel, G{\"u}nther and Meyer, Julia and M{\"u}ller-Nurasyid, Martina and Ganna, Andrea and Sarin, Antti-Pekka and Yengo, Loic and Shungin, Dmitry and Luan, Jian{\textquoteright}an and Horikoshi, Momoko and An, Ping and Sanna, Serena and Boettcher, Yvonne and Rayner, N William and Nolte, Ilja M and Zemunik, Tatijana and van Iperen, Erik and Kovacs, Peter and Hastie, Nicholas D and Wild, Sarah H and McLachlan, Stela and Campbell, Susan and Polasek, Ozren and Carlson, Olga and Egan, Josephine and Kiess, Wieland and Willemsen, Gonneke and Kuusisto, Johanna and Laakso, Markku and Dimitriou, Maria and Hicks, Andrew A and Rauramaa, Rainer and Bandinelli, Stefania and Thorand, Barbara and Liu, Yongmei and Miljkovic, Iva and Lind, Lars and Doney, Alex and Perola, Markus and Hingorani, Aroon and Kivimaki, Mika and Kumari, Meena and Bennett, Amanda J and Groves, Christopher J and Herder, Christian and Koistinen, Heikki A and Kinnunen, Leena and Faire, Ulf de and Bakker, Stephan J L and Uusitupa, Matti and Palmer, Colin N A and Jukema, J Wouter and Sattar, Naveed and Pouta, Anneli and Snieder, Harold and Boerwinkle, Eric and Pankow, James S and Magnusson, Patrik K and Krus, Ulrika and Scapoli, Chiara and de Geus, Eco J C N and Bl{\"u}her, Matthias and Wolffenbuttel, Bruce H R and Province, Michael A and Abecasis, Goncalo R and Meigs, James B and Hovingh, G Kees and Lindstr{\"o}m, Jaana and Wilson, James F and Wright, Alan F and Dedoussis, George V and Bornstein, Stefan R and Schwarz, Peter E H and T{\"o}njes, Anke and Winkelmann, Bernhard R and Boehm, Bernhard O and M{\"a}rz, Winfried and Metspalu, Andres and Price, Jackie F and Deloukas, Panos and K{\"o}rner, Antje and Lakka, Timo A and Keinanen-Kiukaanniemi, Sirkka M and Saaristo, Timo E and Bergman, Richard N and Tuomilehto, Jaakko and Wareham, Nicholas J and Langenberg, Claudia and M{\"a}nnist{\"o}, Satu and Franks, Paul W and Hayward, Caroline and Vitart, Veronique and Kaprio, Jaakko and Visvikis-Siest, Sophie and Balkau, Beverley and Altshuler, David and Rudan, Igor and Stumvoll, Michael and Campbell, Harry and van Duijn, Cornelia M and Gieger, Christian and Illig, Thomas and Ferrucci, Luigi and Pedersen, Nancy L and Pramstaller, Peter P and Boehnke, Michael and Frayling, Timothy M and Shuldiner, Alan R and Peyser, Patricia A and Kardia, Sharon L R and Palmer, Lyle J and Penninx, Brenda W and Meneton, Pierre and Harris, Tamara B and Navis, Gerjan and Harst, Pim van der and Smith, George Davey and Forouhi, Nita G and Loos, Ruth J F and Salomaa, Veikko and Soranzo, Nicole and Boomsma, Dorret I and Groop, Leif and Tuomi, Tiinamaija and Hofman, Albert and Munroe, Patricia B and Gudnason, Vilmundur and Siscovick, David S and Watkins, Hugh and Lecoeur, Cecile and Vollenweider, Peter and Franco-Cereceda, Anders and Eriksson, Per and Jarvelin, Marjo-Riitta and Stefansson, Kari and Hamsten, Anders and Nicholson, George and Karpe, Fredrik and Dermitzakis, Emmanouil T and Lindgren, Cecilia M and McCarthy, Mark I and Froguel, Philippe and Kaakinen, Marika A and Lyssenko, Valeriya and Watanabe, Richard M and Ingelsson, Erik and Florez, Jose C and Dupuis, Jos{\'e}e and Barroso, In{\^e}s and Morris, Andrew P and Prokopenko, Inga and Meta-Analyses of Glucose and Insulin-related traits Consortium (MAGIC)} } @article {450, title = {Teacher-rated aggression and co-occurring behaviors and emotional problems among schoolchildren in four population-based European cohorts}, journal = {PLoS One}, volume = {16}, year = {2021}, pages = {e0238667}, abstract = {

Aggressive behavior in school is an ongoing concern. The current focus is on specific manifestations such as bullying, but the behavior is broad and heterogenous. Children spend a substantial amount of time in school, but their behaviors in the school setting tend to be less well characterized than at home. Because aggression may index multiple behavioral problems, we used three validated instruments to assess means, correlations and gender differences of teacher-rated aggressive behavior with co-occurring externalizing/internalizing problems and social behavior in 39,936 schoolchildren aged 7-14 from 4 population-based cohorts from Finland, the Netherlands, and the UK. Correlations of aggressive behavior were high with all other externalizing problems (r: 0.47-0.80) and lower with internalizing problems (r: 0.02-0.39). A negative association was observed with prosocial behavior (r: -0.33 to -0.54). Mean levels of aggressive behavior differed significantly by gender. Despite the higher mean levels of aggressive behavior in boys, the correlations were notably similar for boys and girls (e.g., aggressive-hyperactivity correlations: 0.51-0.75 boys, 0.47-0.70 girls) and did not vary greatly with respect to age, instrument or cohort. Thus, teacher-rated aggressive behavior rarely occurs in isolation; boys and girls with problems of aggressive behavior likely require help with other behavioral and emotional problems. Important to note, higher aggressive behavior is not only associated with higher amounts of other externalizing and internalizing problems but also with lower levels of prosocial behavior.

}, doi = {10.1371/journal.pone.0238667}, author = {Whipp, Alyce M and Vuoksimaa, Eero and Bolhuis, Koen and de Zeeuw, Eveline L and Korhonen, Tellervo and Mauri, Matteo and Pulkkinen, Lea and Rimfeld, Kaili and Rose, Richard J and van Beijsterveldt, Catharina Toos E M and Bartels, Meike and Plomin, Robert and Tiemeier, Henning and Kaprio, Jaakko and Boomsma, Dorret I} } @article {422, title = {Harmonizing behavioral outcomes across studies, raters, and countries: application to the genetic analysis of aggression in the ACTION Consortium}, journal = {Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry}, volume = {61}, year = {2020}, pages = {807{\textendash}817}, abstract = {

BACKGROUND: Aggression in children has genetic and environmental causes. Studies of aggression can pool existing datasets to include more complex models of social effects. Such analyses require large datasets with harmonized outcome measures. Here, we made use of a reference panel for phenotype data to harmonize multiple aggression measures in school-aged children to jointly analyze data from five large twin cohorts.

METHODS: Individual level aggression data on 86,559 children (42,468 twin pairs) were available in five European twin cohorts measured by different instruments. A phenotypic reference panel was collected which enabled a model-based phenotype harmonization approach. A bi-factor integration model in the integrative data analysis framework was developed to model aggression across studies while adjusting for rater, age, and sex. Finally, harmonized aggression scores were analyzed to estimate contributions of genes, environment, and social interaction to aggression. The large sample size allowed adequate power to test for sibling interaction effects, with unique dynamics permitted for opposite-sex twins.

RESULTS: The best-fitting model found a high level of overall heritability of aggression (\ 60\%). Different heritability rates of aggression across sex were marginally significant, with heritability estimates in boys of \ 64\% and \ 58\% in girls. Sibling interaction effects were only significant in the opposite-sex twin pairs: the interaction effect of males on their female co-twin differed from the effect of females on their male co-twin. An aggressive female had a positive effect on male co-twin aggression, whereas more aggression in males had a negative influence on a female co-twin.

CONCLUSIONS: Opposite-sex twins displayed unique social dynamics of aggressive behaviors in a joint analysis of a large, multinational dataset. The integrative data analysis framework, applied in combination with a reference panel, has the potential to elucidate broad, generalizable results in the investigation of common psychological traits in children.

}, keywords = {Aggression, developmental psychopathology, integrative data analysis, phenotype reference panel, twin modeling}, doi = {10.1111/jcpp.13188}, author = {Luningham, Justin M and Hendriks, Anne M and Krapohl, Eva and Fung Ip, Hill and van Beijsterveldt, Catharina E M and Lundstr{\"o}m, Sebastian and Vuoksimaa, Eero and Korhonen, Tellervo and Lichtenstein, Paul and Plomin, Robert and Pulkkinen, Lea and Rose, Richard J and Kaprio, Jaakko and Bartels, Meike and Boomsma, Dorret I and Lubke, Gitta H} } @article {423, title = {Identification, heritability, and relation with gene expression of novel DNA methylation loci for blood pressure}, journal = {Hypertension}, volume = {76}, year = {2020}, pages = {195{\textendash}205}, abstract = {

We conducted an epigenome-wide association study meta-analysis on blood pressure (BP) in 4820 individuals of European and African ancestry aged 14 to 69. Genome-wide DNA methylation data from peripheral leukocytes were obtained using the Infinium Human Methylation 450k BeadChip. The epigenome-wide association study meta-analysis identified 39 BP-related CpG sites with P\<1$\times$10-5. In silico replication in the CHARGE consortium of 17 010 individuals validated 16 of these CpG sites. Out of the 16 CpG sites, 13 showed novel association with BP. Conversely, out of the 126 CpG sites identified as being associated (P\<1$\times$10-7) with BP in the CHARGE consortium, 21 were replicated in the current study. Methylation levels of all the 34 CpG sites that were cross-validated by the current study and the CHARGE consortium were heritable and 6 showed association with gene expression. Furthermore, 9 CpG sites also showed association with BP with P\<0.05 and consistent direction of the effect in the meta-analysis of the Finnish Twin Cohort (199 twin pairs and 4 singletons; 61\% monozygous) and the Netherlands Twin Register (266 twin pairs and 62 singletons; 84\% monozygous). Bivariate quantitative genetic modeling of the twin data showed that a majority of the phenotypic correlations between methylation levels of these CpG sites and BP could be explained by shared unique environmental rather than genetic factors, with 100\% of the correlations of systolic BP with cg19693031 (TXNIP) and cg00716257 (JDP2) determined by environmental effects acting on both systolic BP and methylation levels.

}, keywords = {blood pressure, DNA methylation, epigenome, hypertension, twin study}, doi = {10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.120.14973}, author = {Huang, Yisong and Ollikainen, Miina and Muniandy, Maheswary and Zhang, Tao and van Dongen, Jenny and Hao, Guang and van der Most, Peter J and Pan, Yue and Pervjakova, Natalia and Sun, Yan V and Hui, Qin and Lahti, Jari and Fraszczyk, Eliza and Lu, Xueling and Sun, Dianjianyi and Richard, Melissa A and Willemsen, Gonneke and Heikkil{\"a}, Kauko and Mateo Leach, Irene and Mononen, Nina and K{\"a}h{\"o}nen, Mika and Hurme, Mikko A and Raitakari, Olli T and Drake, Amanda J and Perola, Markus and Nuotio, Marja-Liisa and Huang, Yunfeng and Khulan, Batbayar and R{\"a}ikk{\"o}nen, Katri and Wolffenbuttel, Bruce H R and Zhernakova, Alexandra and Fu, Jingyuan and Zhu, Haidong and Dong, Yanbin and van Vliet-Ostaptchouk, Jana V and Franke, Lude and Eriksson, Johan G and Fornage, Myriam and Milani, Lili and Lehtim{\"a}ki, Terho and Vaccarino, Viola and Boomsma, Dorret I and van der Harst, Pim and de Geus, Eco J C and Salomaa, Veikko and Li, Shengxu and Chen, Wei and Su, Shaoyong and Wilson, James and Snieder, Harold and Kaprio, Jaakko and Wang, Xiaoling} } @article {230, title = {Childhood aggression and the co-occurrence of behavioural and emotional problems: results across ages 3{\textendash}16~years from multiple raters in six cohorts in the EU-ACTION project}, journal = {European Child {\&} Adolescent Psychiatry}, year = {2018}, month = {May}, abstract = {

Childhood aggression and its resulting consequences inflict a huge burden on affected children, their relatives, teachers, peers and society as a whole. Aggression during childhood rarely occurs in isolation and is correlated with other symptoms of childhood psychopathology. In this paper, we aim to describe and improve the understanding of the co-occurrence of aggression with other forms of childhood psychopathology. We focus on the co-occurrence of aggression and other childhood behavioural and emotional problems, including other externalising problems, attention problems and anxiety\–depression. The data were brought together within the EU-ACTION (Aggression in Children: unravelling gene-environment interplay to inform Treatment and InterventiON strategies) project. We analysed the co-occurrence of aggression and other childhood behavioural and emotional problems as a function of the child\&$\#$39;s age (ages 3 through 16\ years), gender, the person rating the behaviour (father, mother or self) and assessment instrument. The data came from six large population-based European cohort studies from the Netherlands (2x), the UK, Finland and Sweden (2x). Multiple assessment instruments, including the Child Behaviour Checklist (CBCL), the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) and Multidimensional Peer Nomination Inventory (MPNI), were used. There was a good representation of boys and girls in each age category, with data for 30,523 3- to 4-year-olds (49.5{\%} boys), 20,958 5- to 6-year-olds (49.6{\%} boys), 18,291 7- to 8-year-olds (49.0{\%} boys), 27,218 9- to 10-year-olds (49.4{\%} boys), 18,543 12- to 13-year-olds (48.9{\%} boys) and 10,088 15- to 16-year-olds (46.6{\%} boys). We replicated the well-established gender differences in average aggression scores at most ages for parental ratings. The gender differences decreased with age and were not present for self-reports. Aggression co-occurred with the majority of other behavioural and social problems, from both externalising and internalising domains. At each age, the co-occurrence was particularly prevalent for aggression and oppositional and ADHD-related problems, with correlations of around 0.5 in general. Aggression also showed substantial associations with anxiety\–depression and other internalizing symptoms (correlations around 0.4). Co-occurrence for self-reported problems was somewhat higher than for parental reports, but we found neither rater differences, nor differences across assessment instruments in co-occurrence patterns. There were large similarities in co-occurrence patterns across the different European countries. Finally, co-occurrence was generally stable across age and sex, and if any change was observed, it indicated stronger correlations when children grew older. We present an online tool to visualise these associations as a function of rater, gender, instrument and cohort. In addition, we present a description of the full EU-ACTION projects, its first results and the future perspectives.

Related interactive tool here.

}, issn = {1435-165X}, doi = {10.1007/s00787-018-1169-1}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-018-1169-1}, author = {Meike Bartels and Anne Hendriks and Matteo Mauri and Eva Krapohl and Alyce Whipp and Koen Bolhuis and Conde, Lucia Colodro and Luningham, Justin and Fung Ip, Hill and Fiona Hagenbeek and Roetman, Peter and Gatej, Raluca and Lamers, Audri and Michel G. Nivard and Jenny van Dongen and Lu, Yi and Christel Middeldorp and van Beijsterveldt, Toos and Vermeiren, Robert and Thomas Hankemeier and Kluft, Cees and Medland, Sarah and Lundstr{\"o}m, Sebastian and Richard J. Rose and Pulkkinen, Lea and Vuoksimaa, Eero and Korhonen, Tellervo and Martin, Nicholas G. and Gitta Lubke and Catrin Finkenauer and Vassilios Fanos and Henning Tiemeier and Lichtenstein, Paul and Robert Plomin and Kaprio, Jaakko and Dorret I. Boomsma} } @article {254, title = {Early adolescent aggression predicts antisocial personality disorder in young adults: a population-based study}, journal = {European Child {\&} Adolescent Psychiatry}, year = {2018}, month = {Jul}, abstract = {

Modestly prevalent in the general population ({\textasciitilde}{\th}inspace}4{\%}), but highly prevalent in prison populations (\>{\th}inspace}40{\%}), the diagnosis of antisocial personality disorder (ASPD) involves aggression as one of several possible criteria. Using multiple informants, we aimed to determine if general aggression, as well as direct and indirect subtypes, assessed in early adolescence (ages 12, 14) predict young adulthood ASPD in a population-based sample. Using data from a Finnish population-based longitudinal twin cohort study with psychiatric interviews available at age 22 (N{\th}inspace}={\th}inspace}1347), we obtained DSM-IV-based ASPD diagnoses. Aggression measures from ages 12 (parental and teacher ratings) and 14 (teacher, self, and co-twin ratings) were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) of ASPD from logistic regression models and the area under the curve (AUC) from receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Analyses were adjusted for sex, age, and family structure. All informants\&$\#$39; aggression ratings were significant (p{\th}inspace}\<{\th}inspace}0.05) predictors of ASPD (OR range 1.3\–1.8; AUC range 0.65\–0.72). Correlations between informants ranged from 0.13 to 0.33. Models including two or more aggression ratings, particularly age 14 teacher and self ratings, more accurately predicted ASPD (AUC: 0.80; 95{\%} confidence interval 0.73\–0.87). Direct aggression rated by all informants significantly predicted ASPD (OR range 1.4\–1.9), whereas only self-rated indirect aggression was significantly associated with ASPD (OR{\th}inspace}={\th}inspace}1.4). Across different informants, general and direct aggression at ages 12 and 14 predicted ASPD in a population-based sample. Psychiatric, social, and parenting interventions for ASPD prevention should focus on children and adolescents with high aggression levels, with an aim to gather information from multiple informants.

}, issn = {1435-165X}, doi = {10.1007/s00787-018-1198-9}, url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-018-1198-9}, author = {Alyce Whipp and Korhonen, Tellervo and Raevuori, Anu and Heikkil{\"a}, Kauko and Pulkkinen, Lea and Richard J. Rose and Kaprio, Jaakko and Vuoksimaa, Eero} } @article {102, title = {Longitudinal heritability of childhood aggression.}, journal = {Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet}, year = {2016}, month = {2016 Jan 19}, abstract = {

The genetic and environmental contributions to the variation and longitudinal stability in childhood aggressive behavior were assessed in two large twin cohorts, the Netherlands Twin Register (NTR), and the Twins Early Development Study (TEDS; United Kingdom). In NTR, maternal ratings on aggression from the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) were available for 10,765 twin pairs at age 7, for 8,557 twin pairs at age 9/10, and for 7,176 twin pairs at age 12. In TEDS, parental ratings of conduct disorder from the Strength and Difficulty Questionnaire (SDQ) were available for 6,897 twin pairs at age 7, for 3,028 twin pairs at age 9 and for 5,716 twin pairs at age 12. In both studies, stability and heritability of aggressive behavioral problems was high. Heritability was on average somewhat, but significantly, lower in TEDS (around 60\%) than in NTR (between 50\% and 80\%) and sex differences were slightly larger in the NTR sample. In both studies, the influence of shared environment was similar: in boys shared environment explained around 20\% of the variation in aggression across all ages while in girls its influence was absent around age 7 and only came into play at later ages. Longitudinal genetic correlations were the main reason for stability of aggressive behavior. Individual differences in CBCL-Aggressive Behavior and SDQ-Conduct disorder throughout childhood are driven by a comparable but significantly different genetic architecture. \© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

}, issn = {1552-485X}, doi = {10.1002/ajmg.b.32420}, author = {Porsch, Robert M and Christel Middeldorp and Cherny, Stacey S and Eva Krapohl and Catharina E. M. van Beijsterveldt and Loukola, Anu and Korhonen, Tellervo and Pulkkinen, Lea and Corley, Robin and Rhee, Soo and Kaprio, Jaakko and Rose, Richard R and Hewitt, John K and Sham, Pak and Robert Plomin and Dorret I. Boomsma and Meike Bartels} } @article {257, title = {Role of overlapping genetic and environmental factors in the relationship between early adolescent conduct problems and substance use in young adulthood}, journal = {Addiction (Abingdon, England)}, volume = {111}, year = {2016}, month = {2016/06/}, pages = {1036 - 1045}, abstract = {

AIMS: To determine (1) the prospective associations of conduct problems during early adolescence with tobacco, alcohol and cannabis use in young adulthood and (2) to what extent these associations are due to overlapping genetic versus environmental influences. DESIGN: A prospective twin study using biometric twin modelling. SETTING: Finland. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1847 Finnish twins (943 males and 904 females) were interviewed in early adolescence, 73\% of whom (n\ =\ 1353, 640 males and 713 females) were retained in young adulthood. MEASUREMENTS: Symptom counts of conduct disorder (CD) criteria were obtained from a semi-structured clinical interview in early adolescence [age 14-15 years, mean\ =\ 14.2, standard deviation (SD)\ =\ 0.15]. Frequency of alcohol, tobacco and cannabis use was obtained from a semi-structured clinical interview in young adulthood (age 19.9-26.6 years, mean\ =\ 22.4, SD\ =\ 0.7). FINDINGS: We found modest to moderate phenotypical correlations (r\ =\ 0.16-0.35) between early adolescent CD symptoms and substance use in young adulthood. In males, the phenotypical correlations of CD symptoms with all three substance use variables are explained largely by overlapping genetic influences. In females, overlapping shared environmental influences predominantly explain the phenotypical correlation between CD symptoms and tobacco and cannabis use. CONCLUSIONS: Conduct disorder symptoms in early adolescence appear to moderately predict substance use in early adulthood. In males, genetic influences seem to be most important in explaining the relationship between conduct disorder symptoms and substance use whereas in females, shared environmental influences seem to be most important.

}, isbn = {1360-04430965-2140}, url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26748618}, author = {Verweij, Karin J H and Creemers, Hanneke E and Korhonen, Tellervo and Latvala, Antti and Dick, Danielle M and Richard J. Rose and Huizink, Anja C and Kaprio, Jaakko} }